Maltese Unemployment Compensation Case

152 A.2d 773, 190 Pa. Super. 123, 1959 Pa. Super. LEXIS 630
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 6, 1959
DocketAppeal, No. 209
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 152 A.2d 773 (Maltese Unemployment Compensation Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maltese Unemployment Compensation Case, 152 A.2d 773, 190 Pa. Super. 123, 1959 Pa. Super. LEXIS 630 (Pa. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the claimant was demed benefits under the provision that, “Ms unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature . . .” Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b). The Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee and the Board of Review, all, so decided.

The board found that the claimant, Carolyn M. Maltese, was last employed as a file clerk by the Curtis Publishing Company, PMladelpMa, Pennsylvania; that her last day of work was April 12, 1957; that she left work without requesting a leave of absence or did not indicate any future intention of resuming work; that in a discussion with the company’s physician she claims she was ups’et because she was unable to take care of her cMld and keep house while working; and that she did not get in touch with her employer again until December of 1957, when she sought reemployment and there was no work available. These findings are supported by competent evidence and therefore binding [125]*125on this Court. Antinopoulas Unemployment Compensation Case, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 76, 137 A. 2d 921 (1958).

In the application of these facts, we agree with the board that it is incumbent upon an employe who finds it necessary to leave work, to take reasonable steps to maintain the employment relationship. Flannick Unemployment Compensation Case, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 606, 82 A. 2d 671 (1951); Burton Unemployment Compensation Case, 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 255, 119 A. 2d 868 (1956); Junda Unemployment Compensation Case, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 254, 146 A. 2d 344 (1958). Failing to do so the claimant is deemed to have voluntarily left employment without a necessitous reason within the meaning of Section 402(b).

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forsman v. Employment Security Department
795 P.2d 1184 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1990)
Grier v. Department of Employment Security
715 P.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1986)
Redevelopment Authority v. Commonwealth
405 A.2d 1061 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Brown
350 A.2d 445 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Yellow Cab Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
194 Cal. App. 2d 343 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Eckley Unemployment Compensation Case
155 A.2d 427 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A.2d 773, 190 Pa. Super. 123, 1959 Pa. Super. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maltese-unemployment-compensation-case-pasuperct-1959.