Malta Manufacturing Co. v. Osten

233 F. Supp. 462, 143 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 208, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9578
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedJune 2, 1964
DocketCiv. A. No. 21913, on Appeal No. 15437
StatusPublished

This text of 233 F. Supp. 462 (Malta Manufacturing Co. v. Osten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malta Manufacturing Co. v. Osten, 233 F. Supp. 462, 143 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 208, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9578 (E.D. Mich. 1964).

Opinion

McCREE, District Judge.

Upon notice and hearing held May 25, 1964 on defendants-appellants’ motion to> vacate and set aside numbered paragraph, one of the final judgment of this Court, entered April 8, 1963 holding void and invalid in law each and every claim of the Osten Patent No. 2,903,736, and pursuant to a stipulation to that effect entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties on March 17-18, 1964 as suggested to them by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth. Circuit in open court at a hearing before that Court on February 19, 1964, and in accordance with the procedure authorized in Smith v. Pollin (1952) 90 U.S.App.D.C. 178, 194 F.2d 349, 350 and subsequently approved in Herring v. Kennedy-Herring Hardware Company (6. Cir. 1958) 261 F.2d 202, 203-204, and the said Court of Appeals upon defendants-appellants’ motion having entered an order on April 28, 1964 remanding-this cause to this Court for the purpose of considering the present motion, this Court on March 23, 1964 having-certified to the said Court of Appeals-, its willingness to grant the present motion and this Court being fully advised in the premises,

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed', that numbered paragraph one of the-final judgment of this Court entered. April 8, 1963 holding void and invalid', in law each and every claim of the Osten patent 2,903,736 be and the same is-, hereby vacated and set aside, leaving: in full force and effect the remaining-numbered paragraphs two to five inclusive thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Pollin
194 F.2d 349 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 F. Supp. 462, 143 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 208, 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malta-manufacturing-co-v-osten-mied-1964.