Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Maloy v. State

Maloy v. State

888 So. 2d 143, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18082, 2004 WL 2725136
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-3010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 888 So. 2d 143 (Maloy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maloy v. State, 888 So. 2d 143, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18082, 2004 WL 2725136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the motion states a facially sufficient claim that the appellant is entitled to additional jail credit and the trial court failed to either attach record portions that refute the appellant’s claim to its order or to state that the record is silent regarding jail credit, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Koester v. State, 864 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
909 So. 2d 965 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 So. 2d 143, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18082, 2004 WL 2725136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maloy-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.