Malott v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Malott v. State

26 Ind. 93

DecidedMay 15, 1866

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ind. 93 (Malott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malott v. State, 26 Ind. 93 (Ind. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Frazer, J.

This cause is attempted to ‘be submitted without any compliance whatever with the tenth rule of this court, requiring an abstract of the record. A fulfillment of the requirements of that rule is so necessary to a [94]*94prompt and correct disposition of the business of this court, and is so well commended by our experience under it, as well as by its existence and enforcement in other appellate courts, that we must insist upon its observance; especially where, as in this case, no important question is involved, and the case would, at any rate, probably be affirmed.

II. Eeffren, for appellant, D. JE. Williamson, Attorney General, for the State.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazer, J.

This cause is attempted to ‘be submitted without any compliance whatever with the tenth rule of this court, requiring an abstract of the record. A fulfillment of the requirements of that rule is so necessary to a [94]*94prompt and correct disposition of the business of this court, and is so well commended by our experience under it, as well as by its existence and enforcement in other appellate courts, that we must insist upon its observance; especially where, as in this case, no important question is involved, and the case would, at any rate, probably be affirmed.

II. Eeffren, for appellant, D. JE. Williamson, Attorney General, for the State.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Ind. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malott-v-state-ind-1866.