Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.
959 A.2d 906, 598 Pa. 605, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 603 Pa. 399 →
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of October 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
(1) Under the law as enunciated by the Supreme Court in Mamalis v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 522 Pa. 214, 560 A.2d 1380 (1989), does a plaintiff’s release of all claims against a principal also release an agent for whose conduct the principal would have been vicariously liable, regardless of any purported reservation in the release of a right to pursue a claim against the agent?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC., 959 A.2d 906, 598 Pa. 605, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1909 (Pa. 2008).
959 A.2d 906 (Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mamalis v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
560 A.2d 1380 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)