Maloney v. State
This text of 269 A.D. 802 (Maloney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Actions against the State of Hew York for injuries sustained on the Avenue of Pines at the State reservation at Saratoga. The cases were tried upon the theory that there was a dangerous [803]*803and unsafe condition arising from ice on the roadway. The decision of the Court of Claims is sustained by the evidence. Judgments affirmed, without costs. All concur, except Brewster, J., who dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maloney-v-state-nyappdiv-1945.