Maloney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maloney v. State

175 So. 3d 387, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14984, 2015 WL 5879256

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 2015

DocketNo. 1D13-5700

StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 3d 387 (Maloney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maloney v. State, 175 So. 3d 387, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14984, 2015 WL 5879256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Russell Maloney, appeals his judgment and sentence and argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm as to that issue without further discussion. We remand the case back to the trial court, however, for entry of a corrected judgment in light of the trial court’s oral ruling on Appellant’s motion to correct sentence. The State concedes that remand is appropriate in this case.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Russell Maloney, appeals his judgment and sentence and argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm as to that issue without further discussion. We remand the case back to the trial court, however, for entry of a corrected judgment in light of the trial court’s oral ruling on Appellant’s motion to correct sentence. The State concedes that remand is appropriate in this case.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 3d 387, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14984, 2015 WL 5879256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maloney-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.