Maloney v. Cuomo

Second Circuit

Maloney v. Cuomo

390 F. App'x 29

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 13, 2010·No. No. 07-0581-cv·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

After our decision in Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir.2009) (per curiam), plaintiff James M. Maloney petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010).

We now.VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

After our decision in Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir.2009) (per curiam), plaintiff James M. Maloney petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010).

We now.VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Maloney v. Cuomo, 390 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2010).

Pincite

390 F. App'x 29 (Maloney v. Cuomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related