Maloney v. Cuomo

Second Circuit

Maloney v. Cuomo

390 F. App'x 29

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedAugust 13, 2010

DocketNo. 07-0581-cv

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 390 F. App'x 29 (Maloney v. Cuomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maloney v. Cuomo, 390 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

After our decision in Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir.2009) (per curiam), plaintiff James M. Maloney petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010).

We now.VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

After our decision in Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir.2009) (per curiam), plaintiff James M. Maloney petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010).

We now.VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

390 F. App'x 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maloney-v-cuomo-ca2-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack