Maloney v. Burlingame Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maloney v. Burlingame Motors Corp.

254 A.D. 803, 4 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7671

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 1938·Published

Opinion

Defendants Burlingame Motors Corporation and Edward Page have appealed from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rensselaer county, in plaintiff’s favor. On August 21, 1936, plaintiff was a passenger in the bus owned and operated by the codefendant, United Traction Company. That bus collided with the vehicle owned by defendant Burlingame Motors Corporation, and operated by the defendant Page. The jury found that the collision occurred because of the negligence of the latter defendants. The evidence sustains the verdict. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants Burlingame Motors Corporation and Edward Page have appealed from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rensselaer county, in plaintiff’s favor. On August 21, 1936, plaintiff was a passenger in the bus owned and operated by the codefendant, United Traction Company. That bus collided with the vehicle owned by defendant Burlingame Motors Corporation, and operated by the defendant Page. The jury found that the collision occurred because of the negligence of the latter defendants. The evidence sustains the verdict. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ.

Maloney v. Burlingame Motors Corp., 254 A.D. 803, 4 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 803 (Maloney v. Burlingame Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.