Maloney v. Bowden
This text of 838 F.2d 1210 (Maloney v. Bowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
838 F.2d 1210
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas McKindley MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jack D. BOWDEN, Jr., Darrell Green, Indiana County,
Pennsylvania, and/or Agents thereof, Borough of
Indiana, Pennsylvania, and/or Agents
thereof, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7680.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 30, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 5, 1988.
Thomas McKindley Maloney, appellant pro se.
Stephen Darley Annand, Shuman, Annand & Poe; Lawrence R. Frail, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Harold D. Brewster, Jr., Hudgins, Coulling, Brewster, Morhouse & Cameron, William Lowell Mundy, Baker & Mundy, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Maloney v. Bowden, C/A No. 84-5192 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 13, 1987).
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
838 F.2d 1210, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1465, 1988 WL 9620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maloney-v-bowden-ca4-1988.