Maloney v. Board of Education

177 A.D.2d 1012

This text of 177 A.D.2d 1012 (Maloney v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maloney v. Board of Education, 177 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In all respects but one, we agree with the memorandum and supplemental memorandum decisions of Supreme Court, Erie County (Rath, Jr., J.). We disagree only with the court’s denial of the City’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiff’s cause of action under section 2 (2) of the Employers’ Liability Law. The motion should have been granted in this respect because the method the fire department selected to train and supervise plaintiff was, as a matter of law, an exercise of professional judgment for which there may be no municipal liability (see, Kenavan v City of New York, 70 NY2d 558, 569). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenavan v. City of New York
517 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D.2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maloney-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1991.