Malone v. Zambrano

Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 16, 2021 Nathan Och , Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS eee CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION AARON MALONE, § ; § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-269 § KRISTINE ZAMBRANO, ef al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), entered on October 21, 2021. (D.E. 83). The M&R recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff Aaron Malone’s motion for new trial. (D.E. 82). Plaintiff timely filed objections to the M&R on November 8, 2021.! (D.E. 92). Plaintiff raises eight objections to the M&R, in which Plaintiff seemingly re-argues his motion for new trial. (D.E. 92). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R to which Plaintiff's objections were directed, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections. (D.E. 92). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the in its entirety. (D.E, 83). SO ORDERED.

. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Christ}, as November , 2021

' A motion is deemed filed by a pro se inmate when it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing, postage pre-paid. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 1/1