Malone v. United States
This text of Malone v. United States (Malone v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-2274 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 02/28/2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ERIC MALONE, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2022-2274 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:22-cv-00049-ZNS, Judge Zachary N. Somers. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
Before DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER In response to the court’s December 8, 2022, order to show cause, the United States urges dismissal of this ap- peal as untimely. Eric Malone opposes dismissal and moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On February 14, 2022, the United States Court of Fed- eral Claims dismissed Mr. Malone’s case. On September Case: 22-2274 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 02/28/2023
26, 2022, the Court of Federal Claims received Mr. Malone’s notice of appeal from that dismissal. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of Federal Claims within 60 days of the entry of judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2522; 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b). The statutory deadline for taking an appeal from the Court of Federal Claims is mandatory and jurisdictional. See Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Because Mr. Malone’s appeal was received more than 60 days after the judgment, we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. * Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) All pending motions are denied as moot. FOR THE COURT
February 28, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
* Even if judgment had to be entered by separate document under Rule 58 of the Rules of the Court of Fed- eral Claims (“RCFC”), and even if no such separate docu- ment was entered, Mr. Malone did not file his notice of appeal within 210 days from entry of the order dismissing the complaint (150 days from RCFC 58(c)(2)(B) and 60 days from 28 U.S.C. §§ 2522, 2107(b)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Malone v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-united-states-cafc-2023.