Malone v. State

350 S.W.3d 48, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2011 WL 4573948
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 4, 2011·No. ED 95811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrelle Malone appeals the denial of his motion for change of judge and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malone v. State, 350 S.W.3d 48, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2011 WL 4573948 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

350 S.W.3d 48 (Malone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Care & Treatment of Hurd
350 S.W.3d 48 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)