Malone v. State

325 S.W.3d 555, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606, 2010 WL 4823396
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 30, 2010·No. WD 71561·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Malone appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction for the class D felony stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2009, and sentence of four years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of plea counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

*556 The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malone v. State, 325 S.W.3d 555, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606, 2010 WL 4823396 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

325 S.W.3d 555 (Malone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carson v. McINTOSH
325 S.W.3d 555 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)