Malone v. State

98 So. 915, 19 Ala. App. 554, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 19
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 22, 1924
Docket6 Div. 249.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 So. 915 (Malone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malone v. State, 98 So. 915, 19 Ala. App. 554, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 19 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The verdict of the jury, as shown by the minute entry, is: “We, the jury, find the defendant as charged in count 2 of the indictment.” This court, in Huckabaa v. State, 95 South. 587, 1 was of the opinion that the verdict was sufficient upon which to base a judgment of guilt, but on certiorari the Supreme Court (Ex parte I-Iuckabaa, 209 Ala. 4, 95 South. 42) held to the contrary, and perhaps correctly so. The latter opinion must govern, and for that error the judgment is reversed and the'cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

1

Ante, p. 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. State
41 So. 2d 632 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 915, 19 Ala. App. 554, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-state-alactapp-1924.