Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Malone v. Romano

Malone v. Romano

127 A. 91, 95 N.J. Eq. 291, 10 Stock. 291, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 740
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 28, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 A. 91 (Malone v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malone v. Romano, 127 A. 91, 95 N.J. Eq. 291, 10 Stock. 291, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 740 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhuimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nawyn v. Kuchkuda
127 A.2d 897 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Myers v. Vogt
145 A. 866 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 91, 95 N.J. Eq. 291, 10 Stock. 291, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-romano-nj-1923.