Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Malone v. Romano

Malone v. Romano

127 A. 91, 95 N.J. Eq. 291, 10 Stock. 291, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 740
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 28, 1923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhuimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malone v. Romano, 127 A. 91, 95 N.J. Eq. 291, 10 Stock. 291, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 740 (N.J. 1923).

127 A. 91 (Malone v. Romano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nawyn v. Kuchkuda
127 A.2d 897 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Myers v. Vogt
145 A. 866 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)