Malone v. Philadelphia
19 A. 54, 132 Pa. 209, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 795
Opinion
We need not discuss the first specification of error, as we all regard the affidavit of defence sufficient to send the case to a jury; and, because it must be passed upon by a jury and may come up again in another form, we decline, for obvious reasons, to comment further upon the affidavit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malone v. Philadelphia, 19 A. 54, 132 Pa. 209, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 795 (Pa. 1890).
19 A. 54 (Malone v. Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowther v. Pottstown Borough
6 Pa. D. & C. 273 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)