Malone v. Luneburg

14 A.D.2d 552, 218 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9665

This text of 14 A.D.2d 552 (Malone v. Luneburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malone v. Luneburg, 14 A.D.2d 552, 218 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock and Christ, JJ., concur; Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, on the ground that a question of fact was presented as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence, which should have been submitted to the jury (Dranofsky v. Collins, 271 App. Div. 932; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knapp v. . Barrett
110 N.E. 428 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 552, 218 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-luneburg-nyappdiv-1961.