Malone v. Hopkins
49 Ga. 221
Opinion
Malone petitioned the Supreme Court for a mandamus nisi requiring the Honorable John L. Hopkins, Judge of the Superior Courts of the Atlanta Circuit, to show cause why a mandamus absolute should not issue directing him to certify the bill of exceptions presented to his decision refusing a new trial in the case of the State against petitioner, lately pending in Pulton Superior Court.
The motion for a new trial was as follows:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 (Ga. 1873).
49 Ga. 221 (Malone v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patterson v. State
185 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Dyal v. State
172 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Gibson Products Co. of Albany, Inc. v. Addison
169 S.E.2d 374 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Stevens v. State
166 S.E.2d 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Hamilton v. State
166 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Bishop v. State
159 S.E.2d 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Harper v. Mayes
78 S.E.2d 490 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Allen v. State
76 S.E.2d 531 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
McLendon v. Anderson
60 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Loomis v. Edwards
56 S.E.2d 183 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Gilpin v. Swainsboro Ice Fuel Co. Inc.
44 S.E.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Williams v. State
15 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Summerour v. Fortson
164 S.E. 809 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
King v. State
163 S.E. 168 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Moss v. State
161 S.E. 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Smith v. State
153 S.E. 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Tyre v. State
143 S.E. 778 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Coggeshall v. Park
132 S.E. 632 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Edenfield v. Youmans
126 S.E. 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Farmers Union Warehouse v. Boyd
119 S.E. 542 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)