Malone v. Goord

257 A.D.2d 805, 684 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 276

This text of 257 A.D.2d 805 (Malone v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malone v. Goord, 257 A.D.2d 805, 684 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a disciplinary hearing at which petitioner pleaded guilty with an explanation to the charge of being out of place, petitioner was found guilty of rioting, participating in a demonstration and being out of place in violation of prison disciplinary rules. At petitioner’s request, the Hearing Officer reviewed a portion of the videotape of the riot in the recreation yards with petitioner present. The Hearing Officer noted that positive identification of petitioner was precluded due to the poor quality of the videotape. It appears from a review of the record, however, that the Hearing Officer viewed the wrong portion of the videotape. Neither the Hearing Officer nor petitioner realized the error. Nevertheless, the correction officer who videotaped the incident and authored the misbehavior report testified that he observed petitioner participating in the riot, knew petitioner by sight, and used the videotape to identify petitioner by name. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, this testimony provides substantial evidence to support the determination of his guilt (see, Matter of Ward v Goord, 249 AD2d 711).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. Goord
249 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D.2d 805, 684 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-goord-nyappdiv-1999.