Malone v. Commander in Chief
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WILLIAM MALONE,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1534 (JEB) COMMANDER IN CHIEF, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pro se Plaintiff William Malone initially filed this action in the Eastern District of Texas,
which transferred it here on June 22, 2018. See ECF No. 8. Although the Complaint was
essentially indecipherable, the Court permitted Plaintiff another opportunity to file an Amended
Complaint that “clearly set forth what his causes of action are and the facts showing how he has
been harmed and by whom.” Minute Order of July 12, 2018.
In his latest 65-page iteration, see ECF No. 10, Malone attaches a number of documents
and alludes to a number of legal theories, but never explains what he is actually suing about. For
example, he discusses 1933 governmental actions and mentions “the design of the Roman
papacy, spearheaded by the military order of the Society of Jesus, to overthrow the liberties of
Private National Citizens of the United States. . . .” Id. at 15. Yet, he mentions no harm to
himself or specific relief he is seeking.
Without any harm that he has suffered, he has no standing, and the Court thus is without
subject-matter jurisdiction to hear his suit. It will, consequently, issue a simultaneous Order
dismissing the case without prejudice. /s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: August 28, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malone v. Commander in Chief (Malone v. Commander in Chief) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.