Malone v. City of Satellite Beach

716 So. 2d 857, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11312, 1998 WL 558850
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Malone v. City of Satellite Beach. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10363
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1998·No. No. 97-1976·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

A previous appeal between the parties hereto resulted in an attorney’s fee award on behalf of the City of Satellite Beach. On remand, the court scheduled a hearing at the request of the City. Although the certificate of service reflects that notice was given Malone, his lawyer, after an ex parte hearing resulting in a judgment was held, filed an affidavit claiming that he had not received notice. He filed a motion for stay pending appeal which both parties hereto recognize as a 1.540 motion for relief.

Appellee claims that the motion is improper because Malone could have appealed the judgment. However, without evidence being taken on the issue of notice, the record would be insufficient for this court to rule. We do not know whether Malone can offer sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of service created by the certificate of service, but we have previously ruled that one in his position should have the opportunity to try. See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lyons, 622 So.2d 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and THOMPSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malone v. City of Satellite Beach, 716 So. 2d 857, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11312, 1998 WL 558850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

716 So. 2d 857 (Malone v. City of Satellite Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lyons
622 So. 2d 621 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)