Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola

377 So. 2d 166, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4876

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find appellants’ constitutional argument to be without merit. See City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 421 U.S. 297, 96 S.Ct. 2513, 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966); Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Co., 296 So.2d 9 (Fla.1974); Winner v. Westwood, 273 So.2d 151 (Fla.1970); Rodriquez v. Jones, 64 So.2d 278 (Fla.1953). We have also reviewed the other issues raised by appellants and find them to be without merit.

The order of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDonald, JJ., concur.