Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola
This text of 377 So. 2d 166 (Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find appellants’ constitutional argument to be without merit. See City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 421 U.S. 297, 96 S.Ct. 2513, 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966); Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Co., 296 So.2d 9 (Fla.1974); Winner v. Westwood, 273 So.2d 151 (Fla.1970); Rodriquez v. Jones, 64 So.2d 278 (Fla.1953). We have also reviewed the other issues raised by appellants and find them to be without merit.
The order of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
377 So. 2d 166, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-citizens-peoples-national-bank-of-pensacola-fla-1979.