Home/Ninth Circuit/Malone v. Calderon

Malone v. Calderon

164 F.3d 1210, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 275, 99 Daily Journal DAR 445, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 417, 1999 WL 11439
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 8, 1999·No. Nos. 98-99035, 98-99036·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny appellant’s emergency motion for reconsideration. Judges Kleinfeld and Hawkins vote to deny the motion for rehearing en banc and Judge Beezer so recommends.

The full court was advised of appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en bane. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The motion for reconsideration is denied. The motion for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malone v. Calderon, 164 F.3d 1210, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 275, 99 Daily Journal DAR 445, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 417, 1999 WL 11439 (9th Cir. 1999).

164 F.3d 1210 (Malone v. Calderon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darnita McGhee v. Joan Yukins, Warden
229 F.3d 506 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 205, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 275, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 432, 99 Daily Journal D.A.R. 445 Kevin Shelby Malone v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of the California State Prison, San Quentin, State of Missouri, Intervenor-Appellee. Kevin Shelby Malone v. Mel Carnahan, Governor of Missouri, Pete Wilson, Governor of California, Michael Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Potosi, Mo., Arthur Calderon, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, Ca.
164 F.3d 1210 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)