Malman v. Lazar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Malman v. Lazar

283 A.D. 1086, 131 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6393

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 1086 (Malman v. Lazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malman v. Lazar, 283 A.D. 1086, 131 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged misrepresentation and breach of a covenant in a deed, defendants appeal from so much of an order as denies their motion to vacate in its entirety a notice of taking their testimony by deposition and a subpoena duces tecum, requiring them to produce books, records, documents, and other papers specified. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The examination is to proceed on twenty days’ notice. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for alleged misrepresentation and breach of a covenant in a deed, defendants appeal from so much of an order as denies their motion to vacate in its entirety a notice of taking their testimony by deposition and a subpoena duces tecum, requiring them to produce books, records, documents, and other papers specified. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The examination is to proceed on twenty days’ notice. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 1086, 131 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malman-v-lazar-nyappdiv-1954.