Malloy v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
This text of 43 F. Supp. 885 (Malloy v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s action is for recovery for damages for injuries sustained, while engaged in rendering service to the defendant, allegedly through defendant’s negligence. The question presented is whether under the stipulation of facts, plaintiff was a member of the crew or whether his remedy is under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.
I am of the opinion that he was a member of the crew. In the cases cited by-defendant the plaintiff had no part in the navigation of the scows on which they were working. Here plaintiff’s duties required to assist actively in the navigation-
The motion to dismiss will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 F. Supp. 885, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malloy-v-great-lakes-dredge-dock-co-ilnd-1941.