Malloy v. Estes

137 S. Ct. 2165, 198 L. Ed. 2d 228, 85 U.S.L.W. 3554, 2017 WL 1037328, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3301
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 22, 2017·No. No. 16–8395.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Marti v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malloy v. Estes, 137 S. Ct. 2165, 198 L. Ed. 2d 228, 85 U.S.L.W. 3554, 2017 WL 1037328, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3301 (U.S. 2017).

137 S. Ct. 2165 (Malloy v. Estes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)