Malloy v. Coughlin
187 A.D.2d 1038, 593 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14122
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s admissions, and the testimony of inmate Washington and Correction Officer Balcer, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner engaged in unauthorized exchanges of personal items. (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malloy v. Coughlin, 187 A.D.2d 1038, 593 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
187 A.D.2d 1038 (Malloy v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wade v. Coombe
241 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)