Malloy v. Board of Health
This text of 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422 (Malloy v. Board of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs performed work under a contract with the defendant. The expense was a town charge. (Laws of 1885, chap. 270.) The Board of Health has no place as a defendant. It is a town agency only. The claim must be presented to the town auditors for audit. (Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y., 324; People ex rel. Board of Health, etc., v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, 18 Barb., 567; Bell v. Town of Esopus, 49 id., 506.)
The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malloy-v-board-of-health-nysupct-1891.