Malloy v. Board of Health
67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 922
Opinion
The plaintiffs performed work under a contract with the defendant. The expense was a town charge. (Laws of 1885, chap. 270.) The Board of Health has no place as a defendant. It is a town agency only. The claim must be presented to the town auditors for audit. (Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y., 324; People ex rel. Board of Health, etc., v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, 18 Barb., 567; Bell v. Town of Esopus, 49 id., 506.)
The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malloy v. Board of Health, 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 922 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422 (Malloy v. Board of Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Supervisors
18 Barb. 567 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)