Malloy v. Board of Health

67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 922
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1891·Published

Opinion

Barnard, P. J.:

The plaintiffs performed work under a contract with the defendant. The expense was a town charge. (Laws of 1885, chap. 270.) The Board of Health has no place as a defendant. It is a town agency only. The claim must be presented to the town auditors for audit. (Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y., 324; People ex rel. Board of Health, etc., v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, 18 Barb., 567; Bell v. Town of Esopus, 49 id., 506.)

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Pratt, J., concurred; Dticman, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malloy v. Board of Health, 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 922 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422 (Malloy v. Board of Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Supervisors
18 Barb. 567 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)