Mallory v. Rahmer

16 F. Cas. 553, 8 Blatchf. 556, 1871 U.S. App. LEXIS 1730

This text of 16 F. Cas. 553 (Mallory v. Rahmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mallory v. Rahmer, 16 F. Cas. 553, 8 Blatchf. 556, 1871 U.S. App. LEXIS 1730 (circtsdny 1871).

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

I have carefully reviewed the proofs and arguments on which this case was heard, and see no reason to change the views which I expressed in the case of the same plaintiffs against George W. White, on the same patent, or to refrain from giving effect to the stipulation of the parties, of May 13th, 1870. Let a decree be entered for the plaintiffs, to the like effect as in the case against White.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 553, 8 Blatchf. 556, 1871 U.S. App. LEXIS 1730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallory-v-rahmer-circtsdny-1871.