Mallory v. Eyrich
This text of 898 F.2d 154 (Mallory v. Eyrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
898 F.2d 154
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William MALLORY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Arthur Primus; Vera Johnson; Charles Collins, II; Mary
Ann Randolph, Plaintiffs,
v.
George C. EYRICH, Chairman of Hamilton County, Board of
Elections; John H. Hermaines; John A. Wiethe; Don
Driehaus; State of Ohio; Richard F. Celeste, Governor;
Sherrod Brown, Ohio Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-3717.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 14, 1990.
Before KEITH and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE E. WOODS*, District Judge.
ORDER
The plaintiff, William Mallory, appeals an order in which the district court deferred to the Ohio State legislature any remedial action to be taken in this challenge to the election of judges to the Hamilton County Municipal Court. The county defendants move to dismiss the appeal on the grounds the order is not final and appealable. The plaintiff responds in opposition.
Upon review and consideration, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be and hereby is granted.
Entered by order of the court.
Honorable George E. Woods, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
898 F.2d 154, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3782, 1990 WL 27170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallory-v-eyrich-ca6-1990.