Mallory & Co. v. Sailing
This text of 48 Iowa 699 (Mallory & Co. v. Sailing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition, when filed, was not verified. The defendants did not verify their answer, and plaintiff's filed a motion to strike from the files. This motion was not pressed to a hearing, but was waived. Afterward the plaintiffs, by leave of the court, verified the petition, and thereupon asked for a default 'and judgment, which being granted, the defendants duly excepted.
This action of the court was erroneous. Wolff & Hoppe v. Hagensick, 10 Iowa, 590.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Iowa 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallory-co-v-sailing-iowa-1875.