Mallissee v. Keown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mallissee v. Keown

74 A. 1128, 226 Pa. 74, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 877

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 5, 1909

DocketAppeal, No. 42

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A. 1128 (Mallissee v. Keown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mallissee v. Keown, 74 A. 1128, 226 Pa. 74, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 877 (Pa. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellant’s title to retain possession was founded on his status as mortgagee, but the learned judge below having found that appellant was not in possession by virtue of the mortgage but as a tenant under an express contract of lease, the title set up in the bill was not made out and the bill was properly dismissed. We have not been convinced that the finding was erroneous.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The appellant’s title to retain possession was founded on his status as mortgagee, but the learned judge below having found that appellant was not in possession by virtue of the mortgage but as a tenant under an express contract of lease, the title set up in the bill was not made out and the bill was properly dismissed. We have not been convinced that the finding was erroneous.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A. 1128, 226 Pa. 74, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallissee-v-keown-pa-1909.