Mallin v. Milton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mallin v. Milton

57 A.D.2d 918, 394 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12163

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 918 (Mallin v. Milton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mallin v. Milton, 57 A.D.2d 918, 394 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 30, 1976, which is in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, upon a jury verdict as to the infant plaintiff and upon a jury verdict as reduced by the trial court as to plaintiff Joel M. Mallín. Judgment modified by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision awarding judgment to plaintiff Joel M. Mallín against defendants in the amount of the jury verdict in his favor, to wit, $15,223.81, with interest thereon from the date of the [919]*919rendition of the verdict. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial court should have denied the motion to reduce the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Joel M. Mallín. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 30, 1976, which is in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, upon a jury verdict as to the infant plaintiff and upon a jury verdict as reduced by the trial court as to plaintiff Joel M. Mallín. Judgment modified by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision awarding judgment to plaintiff Joel M. Mallín against defendants in the amount of the jury verdict in his favor, to wit, $15,223.81, with interest thereon from the date of the [919]*919rendition of the verdict. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial court should have denied the motion to reduce the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Joel M. Mallín. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 918, 394 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallin-v-milton-nyappdiv-1977.