Mallgren v. New York State
This text of Mallgren v. New York State (Mallgren v. New York State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ANTHONY BRIAN MALLGREN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 26-1535 (UNA) ) ) NEW YORK STATE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis,
ECF No. 2, and pro se complaint, ECF No. 1. The Court grants the application and dismisses the
complaint.
“A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to
relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl.
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis either in
law or in fact” is frivolous, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), and the Court cannot
exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint, Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528,
536-37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without
power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated and
unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v.
Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir.
2009). Consequently, the Court is obligated to dismiss a complaint as frivolous when, as here,
“the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible,” Denton v. Hernandez,
504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992), or “postulat[e] events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind,” Crisafi
v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
1 The complaint’s few factual allegations are unintelligible, and to the extent they can be
understood, the Court deems them irrational and incredible. And the Court cannot exercise
jurisdiction of a frivolous complaint. An Order will be issued separately.
DATE: June 1, 2026 /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mallgren v. New York State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallgren-v-new-york-state-dcd-2026.