Malley v. Malley

603 So. 2d 4, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7657, 1992 WL 146980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2489
StatusPublished

This text of 603 So. 2d 4 (Malley v. Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malley v. Malley, 603 So. 2d 4, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7657, 1992 WL 146980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lanigan v. Lanigan, 78 So.2d 92 (Fla.1955). As to the claims that the court erred in refusing to determine alimony and equitable distribution irrespective of the court’s determination that the prior Mexican divorce decree was valid, the simple response is that no request for such a determination was made, either in the pleadings, opening and closing arguments or upon the trial court’s announcement of its judgment. Further, we find no abuse of discretion as to the court’s determination of the attorney’s fees issue.

[5]*5GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanigan v. Lanigan
78 So. 2d 92 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 So. 2d 4, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7657, 1992 WL 146980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malley-v-malley-fladistctapp-1992.