Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Mallett v. London.

Mallett v. London.

3 N.C. 158
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1801·Published

Opinion

Hall, Judge.

He did not complete his first garnishment, but; something remained to be done. — /.The second is a continuation; of the first, and as if done at the same time with the first; and aa. the second garnishment discloses property enough to satisfy the,, plaintiff’s demand there should be judgment for him.

Judgment accordingly,,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mallett v. London., 3 N.C. 158 (N.C. Ct. App. 1801).

3 N.C. 158 (Mallett v. London.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.