Mallett v. London.
3 N.C. 158
This text of 3 N.C. 158 (Mallett v. London.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mallett v. London., 3 N.C. 158 (N.C. Ct. App. 1801).
Opinion
He did not complete his first garnishment, but; something remained to be done. — /.The second is a continuation; of the first, and as if done at the same time with the first; and aa. the second garnishment discloses property enough to satisfy the,, plaintiff’s demand there should be judgment for him.
Judgment accordingly,,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallett-v-london-ncsuperct-1801.