Mallett v. Hopkins

891 A.2d 354, 391 Md. 31, 2006 Md. LEXIS 56
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 6, 2006
DocketNo. 121
StatusPublished

This text of 891 A.2d 354 (Mallett v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mallett v. Hopkins, 891 A.2d 354, 391 Md. 31, 2006 Md. LEXIS 56 (Md. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case, it is this 6th day of February, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, summarily vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for further consideration in light of Armstrong v. Baltimore City, [32]*32390 Md. 469, 889 A.2d 399 (2006). Costs in this Court to be paid by the respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Baltimore City
889 A.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 A.2d 354, 391 Md. 31, 2006 Md. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallett-v-hopkins-md-2006.