Mallet v. Mallet

1 Root 501
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 15, 1793·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The party has his election, either to prove the interest by common-law evidence, or to appeal to the witness to declare, under the voire dire or witnesses’ oath, whether he is interested or not; but after he has appealed to the- witness and examined him, he may not resort to common-law evidence to ■criminalo him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mallet v. Mallet, 1 Root 501 (Colo. 1793).

1 Root 501 (Mallet v. Mallet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Broadwell
1 N.M. 75 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1854)