Malleable Iron Fittings Co. v. Alexander F. Hall

Connecticut Superior Court

Malleable Iron Fittings Co. v. Alexander F. Hall

15 Conn. Super. Ct. 445, 15 Conn. Supp. 445, 1948 Conn. Super. LEXIS 57

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedAugust 2, 1948

DocketFile 71010

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 Conn. Super. Ct. 445 (Malleable Iron Fittings Co. v. Alexander F. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malleable Iron Fittings Co. v. Alexander F. Hall, 15 Conn. Super. Ct. 445, 15 Conn. Supp. 445, 1948 Conn. Super. LEXIS 57 (Colo. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

MOLLOY, J.

The claimant entered the employ of the appellant November 3, 1947, and quit his employment December 5, 1947. By § 718f (b) (2) of the 1941 Supplement, an amendment to the Unemployment Compensation Act, an employee is disqualified who “left work without sufficient cause connected with his employment.” The humanitarian purposes of the Unemployment Act are laudable and understandable. But the act can be abused, and this case is an instance of that. Situations might be pictured where transportation might be a part of “the employment.” This case is not one of those situations. In any event it is unnecessary to determine the question whether or not transportation is a part of the employment. The claimant was not fair to the employer. He undoubtedly encountered transportation difficulties, but they were difficulties which he knew of when he took his job. But that aside, the fact remains that he did not give his employer a chance to fix up transportation for him. He assigns reasons for his failure in this respect which rest in his own imagination. He made up his mind that the personnel manager could not arrange transportation for him, so decided not to await that attempt. He would quit and quit regardless. The Unemployment Compensation Act never contemplated, it seems to me, any such conduct as sufficient and justifiable.

The appeal is sustained and the case is remanded to the Unemployment Compensation Commission to enter an order vacating the award.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOLLOY, J.

The claimant entered the employ of the appellant November 3, 1947, and quit his employment December 5, 1947. By § 718f (b) (2) of the 1941 Supplement, an amendment to the Unemployment Compensation Act, an employee is disqualified who “left work without sufficient cause connected with his employment.” The humanitarian purposes of the Unemployment Act are laudable and understandable. But the act can be abused, and this case is an instance of that. Situations might be pictured where transportation might be a part of “the employment.” This case is not one of those situations. In any event it is unnecessary to determine the question whether or not transportation is a part of the employment. The claimant was not fair to the employer. He undoubtedly encountered transportation difficulties, but they were difficulties which he knew of when he took his job. But that aside, the fact remains that he did not give his employer a chance to fix up transportation for him. He assigns reasons for his failure in this respect which rest in his own imagination. He made up his mind that the personnel manager could not arrange transportation for him, so decided not to await that attempt. He would quit and quit regardless. The Unemployment Compensation Act never contemplated, it seems to me, any such conduct as sufficient and justifiable.

The appeal is sustained and the case is remanded to the Unemployment Compensation Commission to enter an order vacating the award.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Conn. Super. Ct. 445, 15 Conn. Supp. 445, 1948 Conn. Super. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malleable-iron-fittings-co-v-alexander-f-hall-connsuperct-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack