Mallard v. State

114 S.E. 914, 29 Ga. App. 282, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 244

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

1. Under the particular facts of this case, and in the absence of a proper and timely written request for more specific instructions, the charge as given is correct and sufficiently full, and the judge did not err in failing to charge as complained of in the three special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.