Mallard v. State
This text of 136 S.E.2d 755 (Mallard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s special plea in bar. In the material portions of the plea it is alleged that “Georgia Code Section 68-1625” is unconstitutional because it violates enumerated provisions of the Georgia Constitution and the United States Constitution. Held:
This attempt to attack the constitutionality of Code § 68-1625 is futile since there is no such section in the official Code of 1933. Accordingly the court did not err in overruling the special plea in bar. See Bowen v. State, 215 Ga. 471 (111 SE2d 44); Morgan v. Todd, 214 Ga. 497 (106 SE2d 37).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 S.E.2d 755, 220 Ga. 31, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallard-v-state-ga-1964.