Malladi Sudhakar Reddy, M.D. v. Dianna Lynn Veedell and Maury Veedell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Malladi Sudhakar Reddy, M.D. v. Dianna Lynn Veedell and Maury Veedell. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10504
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 15, 2015·No. 01-14-00309-CV·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

01-14-00309-CV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --

NO. 14-0891 § DR. MALLADI REDDY § Harris County, v. § DIANNA VEEDELL AND MAURY § 1st District.

VEEDELL § §

May 1, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, DR. MALLADI REDDY, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 15th day of June, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malladi Sudhakar Reddy, M.D. v. Dianna Lynn Veedell and Maury Veedell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Malladi Sudhakar Reddy, M.D. v. Dianna Lynn Veedell and Maury Veedell (Malladi Sudhakar Reddy, M.D. v. Dianna Lynn Veedell and Maury Veedell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.