Home/New York Court of Appeals/Malkowski v. Diasparra

Malkowski v. Diasparra

74 N.E.2d 550, 297 N.Y. 568, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1048
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 2, 1947·Published

Opinion

Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate 'Division, upon the ground that it was properly left to the jury to determine whether, at the time of the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of Cataldo Diasparra in operating an automobile, the relation *570 between them was that of master and servant or operator and passenger. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malkowski v. Diasparra, 74 N.E.2d 550, 297 N.Y. 568, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1048 (N.Y. 1947).

74 N.E.2d 550 (Malkowski v. Diasparra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.