Malkani v. Presley
800 So. 2d 741, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17196, 2001 WL 1555333
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2001·No. No. 5D00-3632·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s non-jury resolution of the Malkanis’ claims of fraud and failure to disclose defects in their action against the Presleys and affirm. We also affirm the trial court in foreclosing the mortgage held by the Pres-leys but remand with directions to the trial [742] court to reduce the postjudgment interest from 18 percent to. that provided in section 55.08, Florida Statutes.
AFFIRMED with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malkani v. Presley, 800 So. 2d 741, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17196, 2001 WL 1555333 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
800 So. 2d 741 (Malkani v. Presley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. State
800 So. 2d 741 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)