Malkani v. Presley

800 So. 2d 741, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17196, 2001 WL 1555333
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 2001
DocketNo. 5D00-3632
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 800 So. 2d 741 (Malkani v. Presley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malkani v. Presley, 800 So. 2d 741, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17196, 2001 WL 1555333 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

We find no error in the trial court’s non-jury resolution of the Malkanis’ claims of fraud and failure to disclose defects in their action against the Presleys and affirm. We also affirm the trial court in foreclosing the mortgage held by the Pres-leys but remand with directions to the trial [742]*742court to reduce the postjudgment interest from 18 percent to. that provided in section 55.08, Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED with directions.

PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. State
800 So. 2d 741 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
800 So. 2d 741, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17196, 2001 WL 1555333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malkani-v-presley-fladistctapp-2001.