Malk v. Colin
This text of 282 A.D. 1071 (Malk v. Colin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action based on plaintiff’s claim that she and defendant had a joint venture or partnership arrangement with respect to the purchase of certain shares of stock, defendant counterclaimed for an alleged overpayment. The court, after trial, dismissed the complaint and the .counterclaim. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered thereon insofar as it dismissed the complaint. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 800.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 1071, 126 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malk-v-colin-nyappdiv-1953.