Malinka v. Mugavero

27 A.D.2d 691, 276 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5041
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1967·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, defendant’s motion granted and judgment granted in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, all without costs. Memorandum: Appellant and respondent are coemployees of an employer who maintains a lot adjacent to its plant for the parking of employees’ automobiles. The action is to recover damages from defendant for injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of a collision of their automobiles in the parking lot while they were on their way to work. The parties were acting in the course of their employment at the time of the accident. (Kunze v. Jones, 6 A D 2d 888, affd. 8 N Y 2d 1152; Roberts v. Gagnon, 1 A D 2d 297; Chadwick v. Clerk, 19 A D 2d 679; Smithline v. Ghessi, 25 A D 2d 841.) Plaintiff is, therefore, limited to the workman’s compensation benefits and cannot maintain this action against his fellow employee. (Workman’s Compensation Law, § 29, subd. 6.) (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, denying motion to dismiss complaint.) Present—• Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malinka v. Mugavero, 27 A.D.2d 691, 276 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

27 A.D.2d 691 (Malinka v. Mugavero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Livsey v. Main-Livingston Associates
8 A.D.3d 1097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. Wilson
373 A.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1977)
Claim of Husted v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc.
50 A.D.2d 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)