Malik v. State
52 A.D.3d 1235, 858 N.Y.S.2d 623
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 2008·No. Claim No. 112866·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered [1236] February 21, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the cross motion of defendant to dismiss the claim.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Scott v State of New York, 18 Misc 3d 455 [2006], affd for reasons stated 46 AD3d 664 [2007]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malik v. State, 52 A.D.3d 1235, 858 N.Y.S.2d 623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
52 A.D.3d 1235 (Malik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. State
46 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Scott v. State
18 Misc. 3d 455 (New York State Court of Claims, 2006)