Malik v. Ozmint
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6482
HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, a/k/a Ron Tearia Nicholas,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN OZMINT, Director of SCDC; JANICE PHILLIPS, Health Care Authority, SCDC; EILEEN DELANEY, Nurse Practitioner III; VAUGHN JACKSON, Major, SCDC; FNU THOMAS, Food Service Coordinator SCDC, all sued in their personal, official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00387-RBH)
Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Malik v. Ozmint,
No. 8:07-cv-00387-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malik v. Ozmint (Malik v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.