Malik v. Ozmint

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Malik v. Ozmint. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 F. App'x 662
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2008·No. 08-6482·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6482

HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, a/k/a Ron Tearia Nicholas,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN OZMINT, Director of SCDC; JANICE PHILLIPS, Health Care Authority, SCDC; EILEEN DELANEY, Nurse Practitioner III; VAUGHN JACKSON, Major, SCDC; FNU THOMAS, Food Service Coordinator SCDC, all sued in their personal, official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00387-RBH)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Malik v. Ozmint,

No. 8:07-cv-00387-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malik v. Ozmint, (4th Cir. 2008).

Malik v. Ozmint (Malik v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related